Mappers are currently using a variety of keys to describe why a feature began or ended. Should we standardize on one of these schemes?
| Key | Occurrences | Mappers |
|---|---|---|
start_date:cause |
1,670 | 39 |
end_date:cause |
1,554 | 36 |
start_event |
127 | 9 |
end_event |
443 | 9 |
start_date:changes |
67 | 5 |
end_date:changes |
97 | 5 |
start_date:reason |
4 | 3 |
end_date:reason |
4 | 2 |
cause:start_date |
3 | 1 |
cause:end_date |
1 | 1 |
Quite a few of these occurrences of start_date:cause and end_date cause are the result of some imports, so please don’t hesitate to speak up if you think there’s a better way of doing things - those results may reflect less careful thinking than it appears! (not saying it’s not the right answer, just saying, “Please speak up!”).
Personally, I started using *_date:cause just because I was seeing it so often, but I find that *_event makes more sense. The value doesn’t isn’t what caused the date, it’s what caused the start or end. Still, it’s only slightly awkward; if a mass tag refactoring would be impractical, we could paper it over with a more intuitive field name in iD.