Automobile Blue Book

OpenStreetMap has a number of route relations across the United States that are tagged as auto trails (network=US:auto_trail). In theory, these relations are supposed to represent extant routes commemorating the historic route alignments. But in reality, most of these routes were mapped along present-day roads closely following the original alignments.

Or so I thought. Almost 60 of these routes cite route logs in the Automobile Blue Book. They’re concentrated mostly in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, plus a few in Ohio. As far as I know, the Blue Book had its own system of numbered routes independent of any officially marked and named routes, unlike the contemporaneous AAA maps. It’s analogous to how modern cycling and hiking guidebooks describe recommend routes that have little relation to any officially designated route.

The Blue Book routes were largely mapped by one user who hasn’t been active in OSM since 2013. Since they last edited, about 30% of the Blue Book citations have been removed, leaving unsourced route relations. I think these removals were motivated by a spurious warning in iD that was suppressed a month later.

For example, Dixie Highway from Hamilton to Cincinnati (1918) cites the logs for routes 708 and 775 in the Blue Book.

This route was flagged in Slack and a note in OSM as potentially discardable historical information. I’m fairly confident that we could piece together the roads mentioned in these two routes’ logs. The landmarks mentioned in the logs would be very useful to map, and we should map the Dixie Highway as it was actually signposted. But should we map the Blue Book routes too?

This is part of a broader issue of pseudohistoric auto trail route relations in OSM:

Yes! Get these out of OSM and into OHM!